{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["《宣誓條例》第六條第一款","中華民國刑法（貪汙治罪條例）","最高法院 110 年臺上字第 2168 號判決","臺灣高等法院 100 年度重上更二字第 118 號判決","臺灣高等法院 105 年度重上更三字第 10 號判決","都委會注意事項（第五、六、九點）"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["宣誓條例","收賄罪","明確性原則","罪刑法定","職務行為","迴圈論證","違背職務"],"legal_issues":["《宣誓條例》之規定是否能作為認定公務員「違背職務」之法律依據","檢方論證過程是否構成迴圈論證（同語反覆）並違反罪刑法定與明確性原則","職務行為之頻率是否會導致行為性質轉變為違背職務","行使職權對行政機關造成壓力是否構成違背職務","都委會內部注意事項是否具備拘束代表之法律效力"],"legal_issues_raw":["《宣誓條例》之規定是否能作為認定公務員「違背職務」之法律依據","都委會內部注意事項是否具備拘束代表之法律效力","職務行為之頻率是否會導致行為性質轉變為違背職務","行使職權對行政機關造成壓力是否構成違背職務","檢方論證過程是否構成迴圈論證（同語反覆）並違反罪刑法定與明確性原則"],"participants":["辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"辯方針對被告應曉薇是否構成「違背職務」之收賄罪進行辯論。主張《宣誓條例》及都委會內部注意事項不應作為認定違背職務的法律標準；強調職務行為的頻率（如多次協調會）不影響其職務性質；並引用高院判決說明議員行使職權對行政機關造成壓力不等同於違背職務，旨在反駁檢方以「迴圈論證」認定違背職務之邏輯，維護罪刑法定原則。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}