{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0008.txt","chunk_index":8,"documents_referenced":["一一○年大法庭裁定","刑事訴訟法第一百五十六條"],"end_seconds":2660,"keywords":["主觀感受","對價關係","收賄罪","民意代表監督權","罪刑法定","違背職務"],"legal_issues":["收賄罪中對價關係之證明","民意代表行使監督權與違背職務之界限","罪刑法定原則之適用","違背職務之認定標準（主觀壓力是否等同於違法行為）"],"legal_issues_raw":["違背職務之認定標準（主觀壓力是否等同於違法行為）","民意代表行使監督權與違背職務之界限","收賄罪中對價關係之證明","罪刑法定原則之適用"],"participants":["公務員","應曉薇","法官","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","法官（被提及）","應曉薇（被告）","公務員（證人/相對人）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0008","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2360,"summary":"辯護人針對被告應曉薇是否構成違背職務收賄罪進行辯論。辯護人主張，公務員在面對民意代表質詢時感受到壓力屬於主觀感受，不應作為判斷是否「違背職務」的法律標準。辯護人強調，應以行為是否違反具體法規範或逾越職權為準，且本案中被告之行為屬於依法行使監督與協調職權，且缺乏對價關係之證據，因此不應成立違背職務收賄罪，並呼籲法院應堅持罪刑法定原則，而非受社會觀感或政治氛圍影響。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0008.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0008.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0008","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0008/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0008/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0008/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}