{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0012.txt","chunk_index":12,"documents_referenced":["協議書（關於保證金退還之約定）","最高法院裁判","都發局內部試算表","都發局市價鑑定結果（日期：民國110年11月19日）"],"end_seconds":3840,"keywords":["公共財","單一所有權人","圖利罪","容積獎勵","對價性","平等原則","裁量濫用"],"legal_issues":["圖利罪之構成要件：探討公務員行使裁量權是否導致結果不公平，進而構成圖利罪。","對價性與利益衡量：評估政府給予之容積獎勵（公共財）與業主回饋之價值是否對等。","平等原則之適用：分析單一所有權人獲取之獎勵是否與其他案件相比，違反相同事項應相同處理之原則。","裁量濫用：討論行政處分若違反平等原則，是否屬於權利濫用之違法行為。"],"legal_issues_raw":["圖利罪之構成要件：探討公務員行使裁量權是否導致結果不公平，進而構成圖利罪。","平等原則之適用：分析單一所有權人獲取之獎勵是否與其他案件相比，違反相同事項應相同處理之原則。","裁量濫用：討論行政處分若違反平等原則，是否屬於權利濫用之違法行為。","對價性與利益衡量：評估政府給予之容積獎勵（公共財）與業主回饋之價值是否對等。"],"participants":["廖威智律師","發言人（檢方或原告律師）","蕭玉弘律師"],"participants_raw":["發言人（檢方或原告律師）","蕭玉弘律師（辯方，被提及）","廖威智律師（辯方，被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0012","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":3540,"summary":"本段逐字稿為針對一起涉嫌圖利罪之案件的法律論述。論點聚焦於被告透過單一所有權人之特殊條件，獲取極高額的容積獎勵（綠建築、智慧建築、耐震設計），導致其獲益遠高於一般案件，違反平等原則且構成裁量濫用。針對辯方主張的成本抵扣及回饋價值，發言者強調應關注公共財獎勵與實際回饋之對價失衡，指出獎勵價值高達百億元，而實際回饋價值僅約三至四億元。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0012.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0012.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0012","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0012/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0012/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0012/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}