{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0013.txt","chunk_index":13,"documents_referenced":["監察院一零二年調查報告","監察院一零五年糾正案","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例（特別是第七條）","都計法第二十四條"],"end_seconds":4135,"keywords":["京華城","公共利益","容積獎勵","對價性","都市計畫變更","都發局","類推適用"],"legal_issues":["公共利益之認定（合法性與對價性之衡量）","對價性（容積獎勵與回饋專案價值之不對等）","監察院調查報告對都發局審查權限之解釋","都發局之審查義務（形式審查 vs. 實質審查，涉及都市計畫施行自治條例）","類推適用之法律要件（是否存有法律漏洞及類推之必要性）"],"legal_issues_raw":["對價性（容積獎勵與回饋專案價值之不對等）","都發局之審查義務（形式審查 vs. 實質審查，涉及都市計畫施行自治條例）","監察院調查報告對都發局審查權限之解釋","類推適用之法律要件（是否存有法律漏洞及類推之必要性）","公共利益之認定（合法性與對價性之衡量）"],"participants":["劉秀玲","發言人","蕭玉紅律師","都發局公務員"],"participants_raw":["發言人（原告/檢方代表）","蕭玉紅律師（被提及）","劉秀玲（證人/被提及）","都發局公務員（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0013","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":3835,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論京華城案中關於「對價性」之不足、都發局在審查都市計畫變更時的「審查義務」以及法律上「類推適用」之爭議。發言者主張京華城獲取的容積利益遠高於其回饋專案價值，且都發局無視自治條例中關於「不當或有礙公共利益」的審查職權，對本案採取寬鬆審查，甚至涉嫌違法放行。最後針對辯方主張的類推適用，質疑本案並無法律漏洞而需類推適用。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0013.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0013.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0013","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0013/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0013/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0013/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}