{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0015.txt","chunk_index":15,"documents_referenced":["圖管條例第八十四條之二","臺北市土地使用分區管制條例","都計法第二十四條"],"end_seconds":4725,"keywords":["依法行政","容獎機制","對價性","京華城","都委會","都市計畫","都發局"],"legal_issues":["公務員職務行為是否違法（是否涉嫌施壓或違背職務）","容獎機制之認定（法定/通案容獎 vs. 自創容獎）","都委會審議權之裁量權限與對價性審查","都市計畫變更之合法性（是否違反圖管條例及都計法）"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫變更之合法性（是否違反圖管條例及都計法）","容獎機制之認定（法定/通案容獎 vs. 自創容獎）","公務員職務行為是否違法（是否涉嫌施壓或違背職務）","都委會審議權之裁量權限與對價性審查"],"participants":["柯文哲","檢察官","法官","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["檢察官","辯護人","柯文哲","法官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0015","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":4425,"summary":"本段逐字稿為法庭辯論過程。檢方主張被告（柯文哲）及相關人員在京華城案中，涉嫌跳過法定容獎機制，透過不當指令（如紙條）要求都發局加速流程，並利用都委會的裁量權自創容獎機制，導致都市計畫審議淪為「作文比賽」或權力操弄，而非依法行政。對此，柯文哲反駁檢方才是破壞專業與依法行政的人，並質疑將個案爭議直接認定為違法的邏輯。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0015.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0015.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0015","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0015/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0015/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0015/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}