{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0016.txt","chunk_index":16,"documents_referenced":["都市計畫法第二十四條"],"end_seconds":5020,"keywords":["圖利罪","容積獎勵","平等原則","積極行政","京華城案","醫療處罪化"],"legal_issues":["圖利罪之法律改革與處罪化問題","行政機關之積極行政與風險管理","行政行為之平等原則","都市計畫法第二十四條容積獎勵之適用"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫法第二十四條容積獎勵之適用","行政行為之平等原則","圖利罪之法律改革與處罪化問題","行政機關之積極行政與風險管理"],"participants":["廖彥均","李德權","發言者"],"participants_raw":["發言者（前臺北柯文哲，具醫學背景）","廖彥均（被提及）","李德權（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0016","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":4720,"summary":"發言者以醫學研究的演進過程（從個案到法律規則）類比法律適用，針對京華城案討論個案與通案的關係。他批評臺北市政府在案發後停止受理相關申請是「因噎廢食」，建議應透過建立專家會議、流程圖（Flow Chart）及核對清單（Checklist）來科學化管理。同時，他針對平等原則提出看法，認為平等是指相同條件下的不同地主應獲得相同處理，而非所有地區皆適用相同標準。最後，他將圖利罪的改革類比於醫療過失的去刑事化（醫療處罪化），建議思考改革方向。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0016.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0016.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0016","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0016/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0016/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0016/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}