{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0017.txt","chunk_index":17,"documents_referenced":["京華城案起訴書"],"end_seconds":5315,"keywords":["司法改革","獨立罪","京華城案","羈押","醫療除罪化","防衛性醫學"],"legal_issues":["公務員獨立罪之定義與適用範圍","司法公正性與雙標疑慮","京華城案之起訴書內容爭議","醫療除罪化"],"legal_issues_raw":["醫療除罪化","公務員獨立罪之定義與適用範圍","司法公正性與雙標疑慮","京華城案之起訴書內容爭議"],"participants":["發言者"],"participants_raw":["發言者（前臺北柯文哲、前臺大醫院外科醫師）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0017","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":5015,"summary":"發言者分享其作為外科醫生的經驗，探討「防衛性醫學」導致過度檢查及健保費用增加的問題，並主張醫療除罪化。隨後將此邏輯延伸至公務員的「獨立罪」改革，認為應明確定義以避免司法雙標。針對京華城案，發言者批評起訴書採取惡意解讀與抹黑，並分享其被羈押一年期間父親過世的個人遺憾，表達即便遭受誣陷仍希望以善意面對、不被仇恨淹沒的處世態度。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0017.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0017.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0017","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0017/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0017/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0017/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}