{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0018.txt","chunk_index":18,"documents_referenced":["京華城案卷宗","臺北市都市計畫"],"end_seconds":5610,"keywords":["京華城","南松山計畫","容積率","東區門戶計畫","都委會","都市計畫","都更"],"legal_issues":["京華城容積率調整之合法性與正當性","公務員在行政審核過程中的裁量權","都市計畫變更之動機與邏輯"],"legal_issues_raw":["京華城容積率調整之合法性與正當性","都市計畫變更之動機與邏輯","公務員在行政審核過程中的裁量權"],"participants":["宋元毅","房黃景茂","林周民","林欽榮","檢察官","法官","發言者","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["發言者（前臺北柯文哲）","檢察官（被提及）","法官（被提及）","宋元毅（被提及）","林欽榮（被提及）","林周民（被提及）","房黃景茂（被提及）","邵琇珮（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0018","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":5310,"summary":"發言者以其前臺北市長之身份，就京華城案之都市計畫邏輯進行說明。其主張京華城經營失敗主因在於臺北市都市計畫改變（高鐵終點設於南港導致東區門戶計畫移轉），使原有的交通轉運功能失效。發言者強調，當時都發局與都委會之考量是基於南松山計畫之整體都市發展，而非單純之容積獎勵，並指出若採取「養地」策略等待都更，開發商獲利將更高，以此反駁對該案之質疑，並聲明其在宋元毅之後未再干涉此案。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0018.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0018.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0018","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0018/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0018/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0018/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}