{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0024.txt","chunk_index":24,"documents_referenced":["保全證據申請書","偵查筆錄","補充理由書"],"end_seconds":7380,"keywords":["互動詰問","偵查筆錄","司法獨立","媒體壓力","證據採認","防禦權"],"legal_issues":["保全證據之申請被駁回之影響","偵查筆錄之證據價值（未經法庭調查之證詞）","司法獨立與外部壓力（媒體及檢方之影響）","被告之防禦權（因羈押及縮減詰問人數導致之權利受損）","證據採認法則（證據能力與證明力之認定）"],"legal_issues_raw":["證據採認法則（證據能力與證明力之認定）","偵查筆錄之證據價值（未經法庭調查之證詞）","被告之防禦權（因羈押及縮減詰問人數導致之權利受損）","司法獨立與外部壓力（媒體及檢方之影響）","保全證據之申請被駁回之影響"],"participants":["檢察官","法官（庭上）","證人","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","法官（庭上）","檢察官（被提及）","證人（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0024","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7080,"summary":"辯護人針對本案之證據採認、審理過程及外部壓力提出陳述。重點在於質疑偵查階段證據之真實性（指稱有動手腳）、指控媒體與檢方對證人施壓及洩密、批評檢方援引未經法庭調查之偵查筆錄，並請求法院採取嚴格的證據採認法則，在面對政治壓力下維持司法獨立，做出無罪判決。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0024.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0024.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0024","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0024/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0024/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0024/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}