{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0027.txt","chunk_index":27,"documents_referenced":["貪汙治罪條例"],"end_seconds":8265,"keywords":["不正訊問","京華城","利可圖","證據不足","金流對價"],"legal_issues":["檢方訊問程序之合法性（不正訊問之指控）","證人證詞之可信度（林欽榮之證詞）","證據能力與證明力之爭議（金流對價關係之缺乏）","貪汙治罪條例之適用（利可圖之認定）"],"legal_issues_raw":["證據能力與證明力之爭議（金流對價關係之缺乏）","檢方訊問程序之合法性（不正訊問之指控）","貪汙治罪條例之適用（利可圖之認定）","證人證詞之可信度（林欽榮之證詞）"],"participants":["沈慶京","法官（主持）","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","被告（沈慶京）","法官（主持）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0027","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7965,"summary":"本段紀錄為法庭辯論階段。辯護律師主張本案缺乏金流對價等實質證據，僅有評論與感受，並指控檢方存在不正訊問，請求判決被告無罪。被告沈慶京則針對檢方選擇性呈遞證據、缺乏利可圖之證明提出質疑，並對公務員體系之運作模式及證人林欽榮之證詞可靠性表達不滿。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0027.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0027.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0027","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0027/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0027/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0027/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}