{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0030.txt","chunk_index":30,"documents_referenced":["110年11月19日建價報告","111年11月協議書","111年9月容積交易紀錄","公開展覽行文","都委會決議紀錄","都發局相關行文"],"end_seconds":9150,"keywords":["京華城","容積交易","容積獎勵","建價報告","程序合法性","都委會"],"legal_issues":["20%容積獎勵程序之合法性（是否經過都發局審查、公開展覽及都委會決議）","7月8日會議決議之效力","容積獎勵之價值評估與定價基準（市價交易紀錄 vs. 建價報告）","證據之真實性與合理性（質疑建價報告灌水）"],"legal_issues_raw":["20%容積獎勵程序之合法性（是否經過都發局審查、公開展覽及都委會決議）","7月8日會議決議之效力","容積獎勵之價值評估與定價基準（市價交易紀錄 vs. 建價報告）","證據之真實性與合理性（質疑建價報告灌水）"],"participants":["廖彥均","李德權","檢察官","簡陽光","辯方律師/"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師/發言人","檢察官 (被提及)","廖彥均 (被提及)","簡陽光 (被提及)","李德權 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0030","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8850,"summary":"本段逐字稿為辯方針對京華城案之論述。首先針對20%容積獎勵程序的合法性進行辯護，強調已通過都發局審查、公開展覽及都委會決議，反駁檢察官以八卦訊息質疑會議有效性的邏輯；其次，針對容積獎勵之價值，辯方以111年9月之實際交易紀錄（15%容積約43億）推算20%容積價值約58億，藉此質疑檢方及相關人員（廖彥均、簡陽光）所提出的120億建價報告在時間點（110年）與金額上均不合理且嚴重灌水。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0030.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0030.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0030","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0030/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0030/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0030/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}