{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0033.txt","chunk_index":33,"documents_referenced":["103 年憲判字第 1321 號解釋","內政部國土署函釋","都市計畫審查專章","都市計畫法第 19 條","都市計畫法第 24 條","都市計畫法第 74 條第 2 項","釋字第 148 號解釋","釋字第 156 號解釋","釋字第 742 號解釋"],"end_seconds":10035,"keywords":["容積獎勵","有權利即有救濟","法規性質","行政救濟","行政處分","訴訟權","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵申請之法定程序與審查標準","都市計畫變更之法律性質（法規命令 vs 行政處分）","都市計畫變更之行政救濟途徑與訴訟權保障"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫變更之法律性質（法規命令 vs 行政處分）","都市計畫變更之行政救濟途徑與訴訟權保障","容積獎勵申請之法定程序與審查標準"],"participants":["法官/審理人員","辯論代理人"],"participants_raw":["法官/審理人員","辯論代理人"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0033","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":9735,"summary":"本段文字討論都市計畫變更之法律性質及其救濟途徑。重點分析了釋字第 148 號、156 號及 742 號解釋的演進，強調從早期的「法規性質不可救濟」轉向基於「有權利即有救濟」原則，保障人民之訴訟權，並提及為回應釋字 742 號而制定的「都市計畫審查專章」。最後針對辯論代理人提出之審查標準及內政部國土署關於容積獎勵申請之法定程序（依都市計畫法第 24 條、19 條等）進行說明。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0033.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0033.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0033","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0033/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0033/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0033/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}