{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0035.txt","chunk_index":35,"documents_referenced":["109年9月18日黃檢察官指示","109年9月9日邵琇珮簽呈","圖管條例","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例第7條","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":10625,"keywords":["京華城","公益性","圖管條例","對價關係","文官裁量權","都委會","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["《都市計畫法》第24條與《圖管條例》的適用優先順序與法律衝突","公務員執行職務之裁量權與刑事責任（圖管條例）之界限","行政機關在審核公益性與貢獻度時的裁量權","都委會對公益性與對價性判斷的專屬許可權"],"legal_issues_raw":["《都市計畫法》第24條與《圖管條例》的適用優先順序與法律衝突","行政機關在審核公益性與貢獻度時的裁量權","都委會對公益性與對價性判斷的專屬許可權","公務員執行職務之裁量權與刑事責任（圖管條例）之界限"],"participants":["李德權","法官","發言人（律師或辯方）","邵琇珮","黃"],"participants_raw":["發言人（律師或辯方）","黃檢察官（被提及）","邵琇珮（被提及）","李德權（被提及）","法官（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0035","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":10325,"summary":"本段對話主要討論都發局在處理京華城申請案時的行政流程與法律適用。重點在於爭議是否應適用《都市計畫法》第24條（人民權利）或《圖管條例》，以及都發局已透過專家小組諮詢、要求申請人補充公益性與貢獻度等程序履行其職責。發言者強調公務員在法律框架內已盡職，並批評檢察官過度要求公務員採取保守（駁回）態度，呼籲應給予文官適當的裁量空間，而非以圖管條例之重罪追溯。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0035.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0035.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0035","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0035/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0035/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0035/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}