{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0036.txt","chunk_index":36,"documents_referenced":["智慧建築鑽石級標準","綠建築鑽石級標準","耐震標章相關法令","都法（都市計畫法/都市更新法相關規定）"],"end_seconds":10920,"keywords":["公益性","圖利","城市治理","容積獎勵","對價性","京華城","都委會"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵之對價性與公益性判斷","是否構成圖利之爭議","行政機關之裁量權（都委會之專業判斷與獨立性）"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政機關之裁量權（都委會之專業判斷與獨立性）","容積獎勵之對價性與公益性判斷","是否構成圖利之爭議"],"participants":["發言人（律師或辯方）","賈阿光","邵舊會","都委會"],"participants_raw":["發言人（律師或辯方）","都委會委員（提及潘憶如委員）","邵舊會（提及之專家學者）","賈阿光（被提及之對立方）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0036","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":10620,"summary":"本段文字主要在辯論都委會核准「京華城」案的合法性與合理性。主張都委會作為專業行政機關具有裁量權，且在容積獎勵的給予上，京華城所獲得的比例低於一般法規標準，且承擔了更多公益義務（如綠建築、智慧建築、提供永久空間及維護公園）。同時強調該案考量了城市治理的整體公益（如人行道、都市更新、南松山再生），而非單純的對價計算，並以川普在紐約的開發案例類比政府為帶動城市發展而給予開發商優惠的合理性。","video_id":"HXqeVOdrDrs","raw_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/raw/chunk_0036.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/HXqeVOdrDrs/cleaned/chunk_0036.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0036","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0036/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0036/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/HXqeVOdrDrs:chunk_0036/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/HXqeVOdrDrs","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}