{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0008.txt","chunk_index":8,"documents_referenced":["《積良》","《羅織經》","監察院糾正文","臺北市政府回函","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":2660,"keywords":["京華城案","政治操弄","監察院","羅織構陷","自動調查","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["京華城計畫修訂案是否涉嫌圖利","監察院自動調查之正當性與程序","行政程序是否符合都市計畫法第24條之合法性"],"legal_issues_raw":["京華城計畫修訂案是否涉嫌圖利","行政程序是否符合都市計畫法第24條之合法性","監察院自動調查之正當性與程序"],"participants":["柯文哲","檢察官","監察委員（林勝峰、蘇立雄）","臺北市政府/都委會/都發局","陸律師"],"participants_raw":["被告（柯文哲）","陸律師（提及）","檢察官（提及）","監察委員（林勝峰、蘇立雄）","臺北市政府/都委會/都發局（提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0008","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2360,"summary":"被告針對京華城案之起訴過程提出質疑，認為本案受到政治操弄且具有「羅織」之嫌。其重點在於質疑監察院自動調查之動機、糾正文發布時間與民進黨記者會時間之矛盾，以及強調臺北市政府行政部門在審議過程中均依據都市計畫法第24條合法辦理，認為檢察官刻意忽略法令之行政正當性。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0008.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0008.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0008","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0008/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0008/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0008/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}