{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0009.txt","chunk_index":9,"documents_referenced":["手寫便利貼/字條","扣押之手機及電腦資料","相關公文（涉及京華城容積率變更之往來公文）","都委會審議紀錄"],"end_seconds":2955,"keywords":["京華城案","容積率","手寫便利貼","行政效率","證據拼湊","都委會"],"legal_issues":["是否涉嫌介入都委會審議過程（職權濫用或圖利）","行政指令（手寫便利貼）之性質認定（屬合法行政督促或違法指示）","證據之可採性與認定（扣押之電子資料是否足以構成犯罪事實）"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否涉嫌介入都委會審議過程（職權濫用或圖利）","證據之可採性與認定（扣押之電子資料是否足以構成犯罪事實）","行政指令（手寫便利貼）之性質認定（屬合法行政督促或違法指示）"],"participants":["柯文哲","檢察官"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲（被告）","檢察官（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0009","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2655,"summary":"被告（柯文哲）針對檢方在京華城案中的起訴內容進行辯護。他主張檢方過度依賴從扣押設備中拼湊出的資料來「編故事」，而非基於客觀證據。他強調自己對京華城容積率等具體細節並不清楚，且相信市府制度與都委會的獨立審議，否認介入或指導公務員。針對檢方提出的手寫便利貼，他解釋其內容僅為行政效率上的「叮嚀」或對公文拖延的不滿，而非違法指示。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0009.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0009.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0009","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0009/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0009/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0009/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}