{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0010.txt","chunk_index":10,"documents_referenced":["便當會會議紀錄","專家學者會議紀錄","局處提報單"],"end_seconds":3250,"keywords":["PM(專案管理)","便當會","列管","專家學者會議","提報單","京華城案"],"legal_issues":["便當會之性質是否構成行政干預或非法串聯","提報單及專家會議紀錄之證據解釋與認定","被告是否與特定議員（應曉薇）勾結或密謀干預京華城案"],"legal_issues_raw":["被告是否與特定議員（應曉薇）勾結或密謀干預京華城案","便當會之性質是否構成行政干預或非法串聯","提報單及專家會議紀錄之證據解釋與認定"],"participants":["應曉薇","柯文哲","檢察官","法官"],"participants_raw":["被告（柯文哲）","檢察官（被提及）","法官（被提及）","應曉薇（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0010","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2950,"summary":"被告（柯文哲）針對京華城案之便當會機制進行辯護，主張便當會旨在提升市政效率與議員溝通，並強調京華城相關議題並未列入其個人列管清單，僅由局處處理。被告否認與應曉薇議員有私下勾結或密謀，並質疑檢方僅截取提報單部分內容而忽略最終結論，以及將專家會議的討論過程誤認為定論。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0010.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0010.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0010","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0010/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0010/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0010/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}