{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0012.txt","chunk_index":12,"documents_referenced":["便利貼（關於垂直綠化、蓋綠處理管制）","市長與市秘書之會議紀錄","李文慧傳給王金棠之簡訊","沈慶京之陳述","秘書處蓋章之公文","邵琇珮之證詞筆錄","陳慶元的簡訊","黃景茂之筆錄"],"end_seconds":3840,"keywords":["京華城","府會聯絡人","行政程序","證據污染","選擇性採證","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["公務員是否收到柯文哲之違法指示","是否涉嫌利用職權干預都市計畫審核（京華城案）","筆錄內容是否與證人原意不符（證據污染）","證據之真實性與完整性（質疑檢方選擇性採納證詞）"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否涉嫌利用職權干預都市計畫審核（京華城案）","證據之真實性與完整性（質疑檢方選擇性採納證詞）","公務員是否收到柯文哲之違法指示","筆錄內容是否與證人原意不符（證據污染）"],"participants":["審判長（法庭主持）","柯文哲","檢察官"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","審判長（法庭主持）","檢察官（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0012","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":3540,"summary":"被告（柯文哲）針對檢方指控其干預京華城都市計畫及施壓公務員之行為進行辯護。他主張便利貼建議屬合理行政程序，否認指示秘書或透過秘書施壓，並質疑檢察官採取選擇性採證、抹黑及筆錄造假，認為司法調查具有預定立場且證據受污染。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0012.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0012.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0012","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0012/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0012/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0012/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}