{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0018.txt","chunk_index":18,"documents_referenced":["109年3月17日京華城陳情函","7-6-8次會議紀錄","搜索票申請書","臨申南路房屋交易/租賃紀錄"],"end_seconds":5610,"keywords":["京華城案","圖利罪","強制處分庭","搜索票","毒樹果實","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["搜索票申請理由是否構成虛偽不實","證據能力之認定（毒樹果實理論）","都市計畫法第二條之適用與圖利罪要件之認定","金流往來是否足以構成收賄之證據"],"legal_issues_raw":["搜索票申請理由是否構成虛偽不實","都市計畫法第二條之適用與圖利罪要件之認定","證據能力之認定（毒樹果實理論）","金流往來是否足以構成收賄之證據"],"participants":["強制處分庭","林俊也","柯文哲","辯護律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲（被告/當事人）","林俊也（檢察官）","辯護律師（發言者）","強制處分庭法官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0018","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":5310,"summary":"辯方主張檢察官在申請搜索票時，刻意扭曲事實並建構虛偽理由以針對柯文哲。重點在於質疑都市計畫法之適用、陳情函筆跡非柯文哲所寫、會議紀錄被誤植以及金流分析（臨申南路房屋）缺乏依據，認為搜索票之取得係基於錯誤事實，應適用「毒樹果實」理論排除相關證據。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0018.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0018.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0018","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0018/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0018/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0018/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}