{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0020.txt","chunk_index":20,"documents_referenced":["柯文哲批示之公文及便利貼","監察院糾正案","都委會會議紀錄","都市計畫法第二十四條","都發局程序紀錄","黃景茂之筆錄"],"end_seconds":6200,"keywords":["偽造文書","圖利罪","容積獎勵","正當法律程序","煤氣燈效應","證據能力","金華山莊"],"legal_issues":["偵查程序之合法性（涉嫌偽造文書、不正方法訊問）","圖利罪之構成要件（涉及金華山莊容積率、都市計畫法第24條之適用）","直接審理原則之適用","證據能力與證據可信度（違背法定程序之證據排除）"],"legal_issues_raw":["偵查程序之合法性（涉嫌偽造文書、不正方法訊問）","證據能力與證據可信度（違背法定程序之證據排除）","圖利罪之構成要件（涉及金華山莊容積率、都市計畫法第24條之適用）","直接審理原則之適用"],"participants":["柯文哲之辯護人","法院"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲之辯護人","法院"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0020","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":5900,"summary":"辯護人針對本案偵查過程提出強烈質疑，指稱檢方存在偽造筆錄、以不正方法訊問、製造煤氣燈效應及利用無限抗告施壓法院等程序瑕疵，旨在針對柯文哲採取強壓手段以獲取供詞。辯方主張檢方應對證據可信度負責，並請求法院依直接審理原則，排除違背法定程序取得之證據。隨後，辯方準備就金華山莊容積率之歷史背景、都市計畫法適用、都發局程序及柯文哲之批示等圖利罪相關爭點進行辯護。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0020.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0020.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0020","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0020/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0020/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0020/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}