{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0025.txt","chunk_index":25,"documents_referenced":["內政部營建署回函","圖管條例（第七十九條、第八十條）","實施自治條例","都市計畫條例"],"end_seconds":7675,"keywords":["圖利","容積獎勵","實施自治條例","林欽榮","西部計畫","都委會"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵之法律依據是否必須明確記載於實施自治條例中","缺乏法令依據之容積獎勵是否構成圖利罪","都委會審查通過之獎勵是否具備合法性"],"legal_issues_raw":["容積獎勵之法律依據是否必須明確記載於實施自治條例中","都委會審查通過之獎勵是否具備合法性","缺乏法令依據之容積獎勵是否構成圖利罪"],"participants":["林欽榮","發言者"],"participants_raw":["發言者","林欽榮（副柯文哲/證人）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0025","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7375,"summary":"發言者列舉了十一項關於都市計畫（西部計畫）之容積獎勵案例，指出許多案例（如臺南、高雄、臺北及新竹之特定計畫）在實施自治條例中並無明確規定，但仍經都委會審查通過，且部分由林欽榮副市長主持。發言者旨在質疑林欽榮在法庭上主張「容積獎勵必須有法令依據，否則即屬圖利」之說法與其過去主持審查之實務操作相矛盾。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0025.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0025.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0025","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0025/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0025/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0025/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}