{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0027.txt","chunk_index":27,"documents_referenced":["修訂說明","圖管規則","都更獎勵專案"],"end_seconds":8265,"keywords":["京華城","依法行政","容積獎勵","準用","西部計劃","都委會","都更"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵之給予是否違反法令","本案準用都市更新法（都更）之合法性","行政行為是否符合依法行政原則","都委會審議程序之公正性"],"legal_issues_raw":["本案準用都市更新法（都更）之合法性","容積獎勵之給予是否違反法令","行政行為是否符合依法行政原則","都委會審議程序之公正性"],"participants":["審判長","彭振聲","柯文哲","檢察官","白仁德","辯方律師","陳光中"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師","檢察官 (被提及)","審判長 (被提及)","柯文哲 (被提及)","彭振聲 (被提及)","白仁德 (被提及)","陳光中 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0027","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7965,"summary":"辯方針對本案是否違法準用都市更新（都更）規定及給予容積獎勵進行辯論。辯方主張公有地與私有地應享有相同獎勵，且本案於管理規則中明定「未規定事項準用都更」屬於一般立法技術，並非違法。此外，辯方強調本案獎勵額度低於都更標準，且都委會審議過程包含反對意見，並無預設立場，旨在反駁檢察官關於違法準用都更及違法給予獎勵的指控。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0027.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0027.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0027","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0027/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0027/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0027/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}