{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0029.txt","chunk_index":29,"documents_referenced":["第78次都委會會議紀錄","都市設計科110年8月13日之變遷估計文件","都發局送交都委會之公文（含會議紀錄與居民意見）"],"end_seconds":8855,"keywords":["京華城","容積獎勵","對價","移居城市","耐震標章","都委會","都市設計審議委員會"],"legal_issues":["價值估算之嚴謹度與對行政決策之影響","容積獎勵之審查權限（都委會與都市設計審議委員會之分工）","容積獎勵對價之合理性評估","行政程序中公文傳遞之形式（電子公文與紙本後送之差異）"],"legal_issues_raw":["容積獎勵之審查權限（都委會與都市設計審議委員會之分工）","容積獎勵對價之合理性評估","行政程序中公文傳遞之形式（電子公文與紙本後送之差異）","價值估算之嚴謹度與對行政決策之影響"],"participants":["彭振聲","徐國城","林之宇","薛昭信","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["徐國城","薛昭信","邵琇珮","彭振聲","林之宇"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0029","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8555,"summary":"本段逐字稿討論京華城案在第78次都委會的審議過程。重點在於容積獎勵的給予、共識決的形成，以及都市設計科對「移居城市」價值估算（約23.6億元）之爭議。辯方主張該估算過於粗略，未考量營建成本及耐震標章之高額費用（約20億元），且該估算文件未隨電子公文正式送出。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0029.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0029.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0029","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0029/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0029/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0029/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}