{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0030.txt","chunk_index":30,"documents_referenced":["106年12月都委會會議紀錄","提報單（部分缺失）","都發局109年4月15日簡報","電子公文簽核歷程"],"end_seconds":9150,"keywords":["便當會","宜居城市","應曉薇","指定PM","提報單","行政審查","都委會","電子公文"],"legal_issues":["公務員執行職務之指示是否構成違法介入或濫權","指定專案管理人員（PM）之制度性質與控管程度之認定","行政機關專業判斷之司法審查權限","行政程序之簽核紀錄完整性與告知義務"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政程序之簽核紀錄完整性與告知義務","行政機關專業判斷之司法審查權限","公務員執行職務之指示是否構成違法介入或濫權","指定專案管理人員（PM）之制度性質與控管程度之認定"],"participants":["法官/對話對象","發言人（律師或辯方）"],"participants_raw":["發言人（律師或辯方）","法官/對話對象"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0030","session_date":"2025-12-16","session_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8850,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論兩大議題：首先是關於「宜居城市」變遷紀錄在電子公文簽核流程中缺失，導致上級主管及都委會未獲知悉，且主張應尊重都委會之專業判斷；其次是針對柯文哲市長在應曉薇案中的角色，辯稱其指示係基於局處提報單、指定PM為常規制度而非特定要求通過，且指示送審議之建議與都發局及相關人員意見一致，並非單獨決定。","video_id":"IB49wmaJWtw","raw_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/raw/chunk_0030.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/IB49wmaJWtw/cleaned/chunk_0030.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0030","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0030/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0030/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/IB49wmaJWtw:chunk_0030/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/IB49wmaJWtw","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}