{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0000.txt","chunk_index":0,"documents_referenced":["A21卷至A28卷（手機訊息列印本）","已證18之1至18之4（訊息往來紀錄）","移證24（柯文哲刑事履歷行程截錄）"],"end_seconds":300,"keywords":["刑事履歷","參謀義務","告知義務","捐款名冊","數位鑑識"],"legal_issues":["刑事履歷行程紀錄之證明力","數位鑑識證據（手機訊息、通話紀錄）之認定","李文宗是否履行告知柯文哲之義務","證人（梁秀娟）證詞之一致性"],"legal_issues_raw":["李文宗是否履行告知柯文哲之義務","數位鑑識證據（手機訊息、通話紀錄）之認定","刑事履歷行程紀錄之證明力","證人（梁秀娟）證詞之一致性"],"participants":["朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","梁秀娟","檢察官","辯護律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","柯文哲（被提及）","李文宗（被提及）","朱亞虎（被提及）","梁秀娟（被提及）","檢察官（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0000","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":0,"summary":"辯方針對李文宗是否將相關訊息轉告柯文哲市長進行辯論。透過數位鑑識手機訊息、刑事履歷行程紀錄及證人（梁秀娟）之證詞，主張李文宗在特定期間（109年4月1日至4月5日）並未與柯文哲有相關通話或碰面紀錄，且針對朱亞虎提及的「參謀義務」回函，辯方認為僅為客套之詞，並說明回覆延遲係因清明節假期及捐款確認流程之限制。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0000.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0000.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0000","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0000/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0000/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0000/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}