{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0001.txt","chunk_index":1,"documents_referenced":["最高法院71年台上843號刑事裁判要旨","最高法院76年台上8191號刑事裁判要旨","最高行政法院101年判字718號裁判要旨","補充理由書","起訴書"],"end_seconds":595,"keywords":["事後幫助","公益侵佔","幫助犯","所有權歸屬","收受賄賂","政治獻金","證據可信度"],"legal_issues":["幫助犯之成立要件（幫助故意及時間點之認定，事後幫助是否構成犯罪）","收受賄賂之計罪時間點（所有權移轉之認定）","政治獻金之所有權歸屬（涉及公益侵佔之構成要件）","證人陳述之可信度（揣測之詞是否可採信）"],"legal_issues_raw":["證人陳述之可信度（揣測之詞是否可採信）","幫助犯之成立要件（幫助故意及時間點之認定，事後幫助是否構成犯罪）","收受賄賂之計罪時間點（所有權移轉之認定）","政治獻金之所有權歸屬（涉及公益侵佔之構成要件）"],"participants":["朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","檢察官（提及）","朱亞虎（證人/提及）","李文宗（提及）","柯文哲（提及）","沈慶京（提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0001","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":295,"summary":"辯方針對三項重點進行辯論：首先，質疑證人朱亞虎與李文宗之間關係淺薄，其陳述關於李文宗會將訊息告知柯文哲之說法僅為揣測，不足採信；其次，針對幫助犯之指控，主張捐款行為於109年3月已完成，即便李文宗於4月1日轉告亦屬事後幫助，且缺乏幫助犯罪之故意；最後，針對公益侵佔指控，就政治獻金的所有權歸屬（國家、公益財產或候選人）提出爭議，主張應屬於候選人。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0001.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0001.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0001","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0001/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0001/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0001/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}