{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0003.txt","chunk_index":3,"documents_referenced":["授權契約（111年11月1日、12月1日、112年4月1日之契約）","政治獻金法（第10條、第24條、第30條第1項第4款及第7款）","柯文哲、李文宗、黃珊珊之通訊訊息","核心小組會議紀錄（112年5月8日、7月6日、9月11日）"],"end_seconds":1185,"keywords":["所有權","授權契約","掏空","政治獻金","政治獻金法","木可公司","贈與契約"],"legal_issues":["政治獻金之所有權歸屬（是否屬於參選人之所有權，或為無主物/公益性質）","政治獻金法第10條（專戶管理）與第24條（不得強制執行）是否影響所有權之認定","木可公司之成立目的是否構成預謀掏空之犯罪意圖"],"legal_issues_raw":["政治獻金之所有權歸屬（是否屬於參選人之所有權，或為無主物/公益性質）","政治獻金法第10條（專戶管理）與第24條（不得強制執行）是否影響所有權之認定","木可公司之成立目的是否構成預謀掏空之犯罪意圖"],"participants":["李文宗","柯文哲","檢察官","辯護律師","黃珊珊"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","檢察官 (被提及)","柯文哲 (被提及)","李文宗 (被提及)","黃珊珊 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0003","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":885,"summary":"辯方針對政治獻金的所有權歸屬以及木可公司的成立目的進行辯論。辯方主張政治獻金在成立贈與契約並交付後，所有權應屬於參選人，反駁檢察官關於「不屬於任何人所有」或「公益性質」的主張。同時，針對檢察官指稱木可公司係為掏空資金而設立的授權公司，辯方透過時間軸（111年年中至112年9月）及通訊紀錄，主張該公司初期僅處理授權與維權，並非預先計畫掏空，而是後續才轉向商品化經營。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0003.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0003.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0003","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0003/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0003/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0003/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}