{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0008.txt","chunk_index":8,"documents_referenced":["企劃案（關於累積柯文哲網路聲量及0730產品規劃）","李婉軒與李文宗之訊息往來紀錄","李文宗、李文娟與柯文哲之訊息紀錄","筆錄（包含端木正等人的筆錄）","謝伯鴻之分析資料（政治選舉資料分析、政治現金收入、太陽趨勢分析）"],"end_seconds":2660,"keywords":["代墊代付","公職人員選舉","勞健保","必要費用","政治分析","木可","民眾黨","網路聲量"],"legal_issues":["代墊代付薪資之法律性質與正當性","勞健保掛單單位的合理性（木可 vs. 民眾黨）","薪資支出是否屬於「參加公職人員選舉之必要費用」"],"legal_issues_raw":["勞健保掛單單位的合理性（木可 vs. 民眾黨）","薪資支出是否屬於「參加公職人員選舉之必要費用」","代墊代付薪資之法律性質與正當性"],"participants":["何愛婷","李婉軒","李文娟","李文宗","柯文哲","檢察官","端木正","練宏慶","謝伯鴻","辯護律師（發言者）","顧玲菲","餘孟靈"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","檢察官（被提及）","柯文哲（被提及）","李文宗（被提及）","李文娟（被提及）","顧玲菲（被提及）","何愛婷（被提及）","李婉軒（被提及）","餘孟靈（被提及）","謝伯鴻（被提及）","練宏慶（被提及）","端木正（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0008","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2360,"summary":"辯方針對多名人員（李文宗、李文娟、顧玲菲、何愛婷、李婉軒、餘孟靈、謝伯鴻、練宏慶）的勞健保掛單單位（木可或民眾黨）以及其工作內容進行辯護，主張其薪資支出屬於參與公職人員選舉之必要費用，並針對各人員的具體職能（如監察院申報、答謝餐會安排、網路聲量企劃、選舉資料分析等）說明其與選舉的關聯性，試圖反駁檢察官的論點。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0008.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0008.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0008","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0008/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0008/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0008/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}