{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0012.txt","chunk_index":12,"documents_referenced":["木可好店網站內容","民眾黨Facebook貼文","第四次會議記錄","調查局整理之捐款資料表","阿伯加油站訂購單（證號102號之21）"],"end_seconds":3840,"keywords":["KP小物","不相當對價","捐款換小物","政治獻金","木可好店","銷售"],"legal_issues":["區分「政治獻金（捐款）」與「一般買賣（銷售）」之法律性質","探討《政治獻金法》中「不相當對價之給付」之定義與認定標準"],"legal_issues_raw":["區分「政治獻金（捐款）」與「一般買賣（銷售）」之法律性質","探討《政治獻金法》中「不相當對價之給付」之定義與認定標準"],"participants":["李婉萱","柯文哲","檢察官","辯護律師（發言者）","黃珊珊"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","檢察官（被提及）","李婉萱（證人）","黃珊珊（證人）","柯文哲（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0012","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":3540,"summary":"辯方針對「木可好店」之性質進行辯論，主張該平台為買賣性質而非捐款，並透過對比「捐款換小物」與「銷售KP小物」的定價倍數，以及與市場價格（如阿伯加油站）之對比，論證其銷售價格並無「不相當對價」，不應被認定為政治獻金。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0012.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0012.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0012","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0012/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0012/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0012/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}