{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0015.txt","chunk_index":15,"documents_referenced":["112年7月5日記者採訪紀錄","4月20日之通訊訊息","勞可公司合約書","工作簡報 (含時間規劃表)","費用名目與計算紀錄","黃珊珊之證詞"],"end_seconds":4725,"keywords":["KPShow","勞務對價","勞可公司","募款演唱會","商業活動","政治獻金法"],"legal_issues":["KP Show 的性質屬於「政治獻金」或「商業活動」之認定","是否違反《政治獻金法》"],"legal_issues_raw":["KP Show 的性質屬於「政治獻金」或「商業活動」之認定","是否違反《政治獻金法》"],"participants":["戴立寧","李文宗","柯文哲","檢察官","辯方律師","黃珊珊"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師","檢察官 (被提及)","黃珊珊 (證人/被提及)","李文宗 (被提及)","戴立寧 (被提及)","柯文哲 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0015","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":4425,"summary":"辯方針對 KP Show 是否屬於「政治獻金」進行辯論。辯方主張該活動為商業性質，理由包括：1. 採取公開售票以規避政治獻金法對外國人的管制及退票處理問題；2. 視為柯文哲提供勞務（表演）的對價，類比於寫書收版稅；3. 實體票價定價係基於成本考量，且實際收入（約296萬）低於支出（約454萬），勞可公司可能承擔虧損，不符募款邏輯。針對檢方提出的「募款演唱會」訊息，辯方主張該為討論過程中的初步定性，而非最終定論。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0015.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0015.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0015","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0015/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0015/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0015/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}