{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0019.txt","chunk_index":19,"documents_referenced":["眾望基金會往來明細"],"end_seconds":5905,"keywords":["人事費用","剩餘款","募款","業務支出","眾望基金會","背信"],"legal_issues":["人事費用與活動費用之合理性","剩餘款項支付予基金會是否屬刻意消化預算","基金會業務支出是否符合法定比例 (不低於全年支出及收入總額之百分之六十)","是否構成背信罪"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成背信罪","基金會業務支出是否符合法定比例 (不低於全年支出及收入總額之百分之六十)","人事費用與活動費用之合理性","剩餘款項支付予基金會是否屬刻意消化預算"],"participants":["李文宗","柯文哲","檢察官","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","檢察官 (被提及)","李文宗 (被告/被提及)","柯文哲 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0019","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":5605,"summary":"辯護律師針對李文宗先生涉嫌背信之指控進行辯論。針對檢察官質疑之業務支出比例不足六成、人事費用過高、活動費用過低及租金支付等問題進行說明，主張員工確實參與公益活動，且聘請柯文哲作為代言人是為了提升基金會知名度以利募款。此外，針對剩餘款項支付予基金會之爭議，辯方認為符合法律規定，並強調有民眾黨人員無償協助，因此主張李文宗無背信犯行。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0019.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0019.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0019","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0019/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0019/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0019/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}