{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0024.txt","chunk_index":24,"documents_referenced":["和民德行善團相關判決","檢察官起訴書"],"end_seconds":7380,"keywords":["公益侵佔","所有權","政治獻金","木可公司","法人格","獨資商號","贈與","非法人團體"],"legal_issues":["公益侵佔罪之成立要件（所有權歸屬 vs. 財產公益性質）","政治獻金在民法上是否屬於「贈與」及其所有權移轉之認定","款項進入非專戶（如木可公司）是否構成公益侵佔","獨資商號是否具有獨立法人格及其權利歸屬","非法人團體（如和民德行善團）與本案所有權認定之區別"],"legal_issues_raw":["獨資商號是否具有獨立法人格及其權利歸屬","政治獻金在民法上是否屬於「贈與」及其所有權移轉之認定","公益侵佔罪之成立要件（所有權歸屬 vs. 財產公益性質）","非法人團體（如和民德行善團）與本案所有權認定之區別","款項進入非專戶（如木可公司）是否構成公益侵佔"],"participants":["唐律師","辯方律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師（發言者）","唐律師（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0024","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":7080,"summary":"本段對話主要討論關於政治獻金、獨資商號之法律性質，以及所有權歸屬的法律爭議。辯方主張獨資商號不具法人格，其權利回歸自然人（柯文哲）；並針對政治獻金的性質分析為民法上的「贈與」，認為受贈者應取得所有權，僅是處分權受限。同時，透過對比「和民德行善團」案，區分「非法人團體」與本案之差異，反駁檢方關於公益侵佔的主張，強調捐贈者是自願將款項交予木可公司而非政治獻金專戶，不應構成侵佔。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0024.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0024.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0024","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0024/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0024/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0024/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}