{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0028.txt","chunk_index":28,"documents_referenced":["112年4月20日之Line對話紀錄","KP社財務分析資料","內政部相關函釋","調查局證據整理清單"],"end_seconds":8560,"keywords":["不相當對價","商業行為","定價成本比","政治獻金","毛利率"],"legal_issues":["商業行為與政治獻金之界定","定價是否構成「不相當對價」而屬於政治獻金範疇","證據之關聯性（4月20日之Line訊息與第三波銷售之關係）"],"legal_issues_raw":["定價是否構成「不相當對價」而屬於政治獻金範疇","商業行為與政治獻金之界定","證據之關聯性（4月20日之Line訊息與第三波銷售之關係）"],"participants":["檢方","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","檢方 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0028","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8260,"summary":"辯方針對檢方指控定價過高（不相當對價）提出反駁。主張毛利應參考同業標準而非單一倍數，並區分三波銷售行為：第一、二波屬政治獻金募款性質，而第三波定價顯著降低（2-4倍）且屬商業行為。此外，針對KP社之交易，辯方提出其毛利率僅14.5%，主張並無不相當對價之情形，且目的與政治無涉。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0028.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0028.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0028","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0028/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0028/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0028/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}