{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0029.txt","chunk_index":29,"documents_referenced":["內政部函釋"],"end_seconds":8855,"keywords":["不相當之對價","所有權歸屬","政治獻金","毛利率","財產處分"],"legal_issues":["定價是否過高（不相當之對價）之認定","政治獻金之處分限制與個人財產處分權之區分","票款收入是否構成政治獻金及其所有權歸屬"],"legal_issues_raw":["定價是否過高（不相當之對價）之認定","票款收入是否構成政治獻金及其所有權歸屬","政治獻金之處分限制與個人財產處分權之區分"],"participants":["辯方律師/代理人"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師/代理人"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0029","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8555,"summary":"辯方針對檢方主張的定價過高及政治獻金性質進行反駁。首先透過毛利率分析（1.17倍）證明價格並非過高，並以 Blackpink 與 K-Pop 演唱會的規模差異，以及前總統蔡英文若辦演唱會的假設，反駁檢方將票價與政治支持（選舉）掛鉤的邏輯。最後轉入討論政治獻金之所有權歸屬及財產處分限制之法律爭議。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0029.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0029.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0029","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0029/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0029/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0029/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}