{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0031.txt","chunk_index":31,"documents_referenced":["內政部相關解釋（關於個人責任財產之定義）","民法第761條","臺灣高等法院判決（關於政治獻金性質之認定）"],"end_seconds":9445,"keywords":["動產讓與","所有權","政治獻金","民法761條","責任財產","限制用途專款"],"legal_issues":["政治獻金之處分權限（自由處分 vs. 限制用途）","政治獻金是否屬於參選人之個人責任財產","政治獻金的所有權歸屬（國家所有 vs. 個人所有）","民法第761條動產所有權讓與之適用"],"legal_issues_raw":["政治獻金的所有權歸屬（國家所有 vs. 個人所有）","民法第761條動產所有權讓與之適用","政治獻金是否屬於參選人之個人責任財產","政治獻金之處分權限（自由處分 vs. 限制用途）"],"participants":["辯方律師"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0031","session_date":"2025-12-22","session_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":9145,"summary":"辯方針對檢方主張「政治獻金在交付瞬間即歸國家所有」之觀點提出反駁。辯方引用民法第761條關於動產所有權讓與之規定，質疑檢方邏輯之合理性，並分析高院判決及內政部對政治獻金性質的定義，主張政治獻金雖為「限制用途之專款」，但仍屬於參選人的「個人財產」或「責任財產」，而非國家所有。","video_id":"JaMUi1QUmbg","raw_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/raw/chunk_0031.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/JaMUi1QUmbg/cleaned/chunk_0031.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0031","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0031/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0031/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/JaMUi1QUmbg:chunk_0031/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/JaMUi1QUmbg","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}