{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0000.txt","chunk_index":0,"documents_referenced":["107年5月10日便利貼（關於容積率）","108年京華城陳情書","109年3月10日都發局「不和解」簽呈","109年4月15日都發局提交都委會演繹之簽呈"],"end_seconds":300,"keywords":["京華城案","圖利","容積率","行政程序","訴審訴決","都委會"],"legal_issues":["是否涉及圖利（土力精華）","行政程序是否違法或有特例","訴訟程序與行政演繹是否可並行"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否涉及圖利（土力精華）","行政程序是否違法或有特例","訴訟程序與行政演繹是否可並行"],"participants":["彭振聲","林欽榮","柯文哲","辯護人","邵琇珮","都發局"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲（被告）","辯護人","林欽榮（副柯文哲，提及）","彭振聲（提及）","邵琇珮（提及）","都發局（提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0000","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":0,"summary":"被告柯文哲之辯護人針對多份公文批示與便利貼內容進行說明，主張柯文哲對於容積率變更並不熟悉且交由專業幕僚研究，對於京華城訴訟案件則採取「訴審訴決」之立場，並強調將案件提交都委會演繹係屬正常行政程序，旨在透過公開透明方式處理，並非特例，且並無介入訴訟或圖利之意。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0000.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0000.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0000","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0000/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0000/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0000/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}