{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0001.txt","chunk_index":1,"documents_referenced":["109年11月11日宋公展簽呈","111年2月底金華廣場開發案建議內容批示","卷證 58（便利貼）"],"end_seconds":595,"keywords":["圖利","宋公展","容積獎勵","容積率","細部計畫","金華廣場"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵之創設與合法性","是否構成違法圖利","細部計畫變更與都市管制條例之適用爭議","行政流程加速是否等同於違法干預"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成違法圖利","行政流程加速是否等同於違法干預","細部計畫變更與都市管制條例之適用爭議","容積獎勵之創設與合法性"],"participants":["彭振聲","李德權","柯文哲","楊智勝","辯方/陳述人"],"participants_raw":["辯方/陳述人","柯文哲","彭振聲","李德權","楊智勝"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0001","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":295,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要針對金華廣場開發案中，關於柯文哲市長是否違法圖利之爭議進行辯護。重點在於說明送研議結果為不予置評、便利貼內容僅為要求加速行政流程而非指定結果、宋公展簽呈為必要程序且無否決權、以及針對李德權副秘書長之批示僅為對程序之誤會且已獲解釋。最後提及柯文哲市長之批示旨在加速公文往返之效率。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0001.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0001.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0001","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0001/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0001/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0001/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}