{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0002.txt","chunk_index":2,"documents_referenced":["公文檔案（都發局、京華城、遠雄公司、產發局）","朱亞虎之簡訊","柯文哲之批示或便利貼","都委會及都審會會議紀錄（關於公益使用面積）"],"end_seconds":890,"keywords":["京華城","公益使用面積","圖利","容積獎勵","犯意聯絡"],"legal_issues":["是否存在犯意聯絡（共犯關係）","是否涉及圖利之共同犯意","行政流程加速是否等同於非法干預"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否存在犯意聯絡（共犯關係）","是否涉及圖利之共同犯意","行政流程加速是否等同於非法干預"],"participants":["彭振聲","朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲","沈慶京","朱亞虎","彭振聲","李文宗","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0002","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":590,"summary":"本段文字為辯方針對柯文哲市長涉京華城案的辯護陳述。重點在於說明柯文哲要求加速公文流程僅為其行政習慣，並非干預審查；強調公益使用面積增加證明市政府並未退讓；質疑檢方關於柯文哲與沈慶京、朱亞虎之間存在「犯意聯絡」的證據不足，認為其會面內容可能僅為嚴壽國宅拆遷事宜；並否認與李文宗有往來記錄，且對彭振聲的詢問僅限於樓地板使用之一般行政詢問。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0002.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0002.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0002","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0002/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0002/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0002/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}