{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0004.txt","chunk_index":4,"documents_referenced":["劉秀玲與彭振聲之訊息","都委會及專案小組會議紀錄","都發局內部員工錄音","關於王金棠之簡訊"],"end_seconds":1480,"keywords":["京華城案","公益性","圖利","對價性","認罪任意性","都委會","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["共犯之串聯證據（針對柯文哲與下屬之聯絡紀錄）","是否構成圖利罪（缺乏主觀明知與圖利意圖）","決策過程之集體責任（都委會與專案小組之表決機制）","行政程序之合法性（都市計畫法第24條之適用）","認罪陳述之任意性與證據能力（指控檢方施壓）"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成圖利罪（缺乏主觀明知與圖利意圖）","認罪陳述之任意性與證據能力（指控檢方施壓）","共犯之串聯證據（針對柯文哲與下屬之聯絡紀錄）","行政程序之合法性（都市計畫法第24條之適用）","決策過程之集體責任（都委會與專案小組之表決機制）"],"participants":["劉秀玲","彭振聲","徐國勇","柯文哲","白仁德","辯護律師（發言者）","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","邵琇珮","柯文哲","劉秀玲","彭振聲","白仁德","徐國勇"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0004","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":1180,"summary":"辯方針對邵琇珮、劉秀玲及都委會委員在京華城案中的角色進行辯護。主張邵琇珮表現專業且無圖利意圖，其認罪係因檢方施壓；劉秀玲認為程序合法且無證據證明其與柯文哲有串聯；都委會決策經過多次會議形成共識，並非由彭振聲單獨決定，且質疑徐國勇等委員之陳述受媒體壓力影響而失實。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0004.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0004.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0004","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0004/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0004/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0004/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}