{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0006.txt","chunk_index":6,"documents_referenced":["市長市會面行程紀錄","延壽國宅拆遷案相關照片","微經集團備忘錄","朱亞虎傳送予李文宗、蔡碧如、張哲陽之簡訊"],"end_seconds":2070,"keywords":["微經集團","政治獻金","政治獻金法","行求期約","賄賂"],"legal_issues":["210萬元款項之性質認定（政治獻金 vs 賄賂）","政治獻金法第七條之適用（事業捐贈要件）","是否存在共同犯意聯絡","是否構成行求、期約、賄賂之行為"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成行求、期約、賄賂之行為","210萬元款項之性質認定（政治獻金 vs 賄賂）","政治獻金法第七條之適用（事業捐贈要件）","是否存在共同犯意聯絡"],"participants":["沈慶京","張哲陽","朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","蔡碧如","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","柯文哲","沈慶京","朱亞虎","李文宗","蔡碧如","張哲陽"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0006","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":1770,"summary":"辯護律師針對柯文哲涉嫌行求、期約、賄賂之指控進行辯護。重點在於否認2月20日會面有賄賂事實、主張210萬元為合法政治獻金而非賄賂（原擬以公司名義捐贈但因財報虧損不符規定而改由個人捐贈），且該款項進入黨部帳戶未被私用。此外，律師認為朱亞虎之行為係主動建議捐款並藉此邀功，而非行賄。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0006.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0006.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0006","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0006/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0006/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0006/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}