{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄（陳俊源之陳述）","捐款名單","通訊紀錄（傳訊給李文宗、蔡碧茹、張哲陽之內容）"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["210萬捐款","偵查過程","對價性","獎勵容積","行賄","認罪"],"legal_issues":["偵查過程之邏輯一致性（指控對象之變更）","捐款行為是否構成行賄之對價","行賄之主觀意圖（是否具有對價關係）","認罪陳述之可信度（法律人認罪之爭議）"],"legal_issues_raw":["行賄之主觀意圖（是否具有對價關係）","捐款行為是否構成行賄之對價","認罪陳述之可信度（法律人認罪之爭議）","偵查過程之邏輯一致性（指控對象之變更）"],"participants":["張哲陽","朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","檢察官","蔡碧茹","辯護律師","陳俊源"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","朱亞虎","柯文哲","陳俊源","檢察官","李文宗","蔡碧茹","張哲陽"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"辯方針對 210 萬捐款是否構成行賄提出抗辯。主張朱亞虎將捐款名單傳給第三方是為了讓柯文哲得知其友善，而非行賄之約定；質疑陳俊源作為法律人認罪之真實性；並指出檢察官在偵查過程中因時間線無法對接而多次變更指控方向。最後，辯方透過計算 210 萬與 121 億（獎勵容積價值）的比例（約 0.017%），主張該金額過低，不具備對價性。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}