{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0008.txt","chunk_index":8,"documents_referenced":["工作簿","影片紀錄 (動土典禮)","監察院網站 (政治獻金查詢)","行事曆"],"end_seconds":2660,"keywords":["傳聞證據","對價性","工作簿","政治獻金","證據能力","賄賂"],"legal_issues":["行賄之主觀意圖與客觀形式（政治獻金是否構成賄賂）","行賄事實之證明（交付時間與地點之可能性）","證據之真實性與可靠性（工作簿記載與實際捐款紀錄不符）","證據能力之認定（工作簿是否屬於傳聞證據之例外）"],"legal_issues_raw":["行賄之主觀意圖與客觀形式（政治獻金是否構成賄賂）","證據能力之認定（工作簿是否屬於傳聞證據之例外）","證據之真實性與可靠性（工作簿記載與實際捐款紀錄不符）","行賄事實之證明（交付時間與地點之可能性）"],"participants":["柯文哲","神信經(相關公司/法人)","許芷瑜","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","柯文哲 (被告)","神信經 (相關公司/法人)","許芷瑜 (相關人員)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0008","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2360,"summary":"辯方針對兩筆款項（210萬政治獻金及1500萬之指控）進行辯護。首先主張210萬捐款屬公開透明之政治獻金，無隱匿意圖且無對價關係，不構成賄賂；其次針對1500萬之指控，質疑關鍵證據「工作簿」之證據能力，指出其時間標記矛盾、內容與事實不符且缺乏客觀性，並主張檢方對行賄時間點的推論僅為拼湊，且在擬定之時間段內，被告與相關人員無私下會面之可能。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0008.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0008.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0008","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0008/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0008/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0008/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}