{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0010.txt","chunk_index":10,"documents_referenced":["A1-37（行動硬碟相關證據）","證人筆錄"],"end_seconds":3250,"keywords":["偽造筆錄","圖利罪","媒體渲染","收賄","數位證據","監管鏈"],"legal_issues":["媒體渲染對司法公正之影響","收賄與圖利罪之實質證據認定","數位證據之監管鏈（Chain of Custody）與保全程序","檢察官是否涉嫌偽造文書（證人筆錄）"],"legal_issues_raw":["收賄與圖利罪之實質證據認定","數位證據之監管鏈（Chain of Custody）與保全程序","檢察官是否涉嫌偽造文書（證人筆錄）","媒體渲染對司法公正之影響"],"participants":["審判長","柯文哲","柯文哲之辯護律師","陸律師（辯護人）"],"participants_raw":["審判長","柯文哲之辯護律師","陸律師（辯護人）","柯文哲（被告）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0010","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2950,"summary":"辯護律師針對柯文哲涉嫌圖利及收賄之案件進行辯論。律師主張檢方透過媒體渲染而非依據實質證據來定罪，並質疑證據（如行賄金額之拼湊）的建構方式。此外，律師對檢察官涉嫌偽造證人筆錄提出告發請求，並針對關鍵證據「行動硬碟」的來源及數位證據監管鏈（Chain of Custody）的合法性提出質疑。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0010.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0010.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0010","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0010/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0010/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0010/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}