{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0012.txt","chunk_index":12,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄","司法聯盟鏈相關新聞稿/說明文件","扣押物清單"],"end_seconds":3840,"keywords":["Hash值","司法聯盟鏈","影像檔","數位證據","數位鑑識","正當法律程序","證據完整性"],"legal_issues":["數位證據扣押之法定程序（錄影、影像檔製作、Hash值上鏈）","數位證據的完整性與真實性（Chain of Custody）","正當法律程序（Due Process）之落實","證據是否遭到篡改或變造"],"legal_issues_raw":["數位證據的完整性與真實性（Chain of Custody）","數位證據扣押之法定程序（錄影、影像檔製作、Hash值上鏈）","證據是否遭到篡改或變造","正當法律程序（Due Process）之落實"],"participants":["合議庭","司法院","檢察官","法務部","調查局","辯護律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","檢察官（被提及）","法務部（被提及）","司法院（被提及）","調查局（被提及）","合議庭（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0012","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":3540,"summary":"辯方針對數位證據的扣押與處理程序提出質疑，主張偵查機關未遵循正確的數位鑑識流程（如全程錄影、第一時間製作影像檔及上鏈），且扣押與製作影像檔之間存在11天的時間差，導致證據完整性與真實性存疑。辯方強調刑事司法應基於正當法律程序與嚴格證明法則，而非單純信賴偵查機關。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0012.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0012.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0012","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0012/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0012/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0012/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}