{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0015.txt","chunk_index":15,"documents_referenced":["113年6月6日訊問筆錄（王道會）","113年8月6日證人訊問筆錄（楊智勝）","圖管條例","搜索票","監察院糾正函","細部計畫審議原則第八條","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":4725,"keywords":["圖管條例","容積獎勵","容積率","監察院糾正","細部計畫","都委會","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["圖管條例與都市計畫法第24條之適用關係","搜索票記載之犯罪所得金額/比例是否正確","都委會審議細部計畫給予容積獎勵之合法性","都市計畫容積率之認定（基礎容積率 vs. 獎勵容積率）"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫容積率之認定（基礎容積率 vs. 獎勵容積率）","都委會審議細部計畫給予容積獎勵之合法性","圖管條例與都市計畫法第24條之適用關係","搜索票記載之犯罪所得金額/比例是否正確"],"participants":["合議庭","審判長","張女生","楊智勝","檢察官","王道會","監察院","辯方律師（發言者）","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師（發言者）","檢察官","監察院","張女生（證人）","邵琇珮（證人）","合議庭","審判長","楊智勝（證人）","王道會"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0015","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":4425,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論關於都市計畫容積率認定之爭議。辯方主張檢察官在申請搜索票時對犯罪所得之容積率計算有誤，且監察院將「商山」與「商山特」之容積率規範混淆，導致錯誤的糾正結論。文中強調細部計畫可給予容積獎勵，此權限屬於裁量範圍而非違法，且檢察官在後續訊問中已認同都市計畫法第24條可提供容積獎勵之法律依據。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0015.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0015.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0015","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0015/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0015/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0015/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}