{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0016.txt","chunk_index":16,"documents_referenced":["113年5月10日相關對話紀錄","113年8月6日楊志盛政訊主持稿","都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法","都市更新條例"],"end_seconds":5020,"keywords":["保證金","容積獎勵","準用","都委會","都市更新條例","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["公務員在設定獎勵方案時的裁量權與依據","行政行為中使用「準用」字眼之主觀動機（是否為解決保證金執行問題）","都委會對容積獎勵的審議權限（建議權 vs 核定權）","都市計畫獎勵是否可參照或準用《都市更新條例》之獎勵專案"],"legal_issues_raw":["都委會對容積獎勵的審議權限（建議權 vs 核定權）","都市計畫獎勵是否可參照或準用《都市更新條例》之獎勵專案","行政行為中使用「準用」字眼之主觀動機（是否為解決保證金執行問題）","公務員在設定獎勵方案時的裁量權與依據"],"participants":["嚴邦瑞","張景森","楊志盛","法官","獎勵官","王道會","蘇玉雄","辯方律師/代理人"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師/代理人","法官 (被提及)","王道會 (被提及)","蘇玉雄 (被提及)","楊志盛 (被提及)","張景森 (被提及)","嚴邦瑞 (被提及)","獎勵官 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0016","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":4720,"summary":"辯方針對都市計畫容積獎勵的合法性進行辯論，主張都委會雖僅有建議權，但核定權在市政府。針對爭議中的「準用」字眼，說明其目的是為了建立保證金制度以確保執行，而非惡意違法。同時主張公務員在設計獎勵方案時，可參考《都市更新條例》等成熟的獎勵專案，不應要求每次都重新發明，且強調容積獎勵辦法隨時代演進不斷增加，具有彈性。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0016.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0016.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0016","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0016/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0016/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0016/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}