{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0017.txt","chunk_index":17,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄","維老條例（維護及更新都市建築條例）","臺北市實施都市計畫自治條例（第25條）","都更條例"],"end_seconds":5315,"keywords":["個案計畫","智慧建築","獎勵專案","綠建築","行政裁量","通案規範","都市更新","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["行政機關在制定細部計畫時的專業裁量權與權力分立","都市更新獎勵專案是否僅限於都更案件使用","都市計畫中「個案獎勵」轉化為「通案規範」的合法性與實務路徑"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市更新獎勵專案是否僅限於都更案件使用","都市計畫中「個案獎勵」轉化為「通案規範」的合法性與實務路徑","行政機關在制定細部計畫時的專業裁量權與權力分立"],"participants":["劉秀玲","少舊配","張立立","李德權","楊智","王錦茂","蔣官","鄭律師","陳志明"],"participants_raw":["王錦茂","楊智","少舊配","張立立","蔣官（偵查人員/法官）","劉秀玲","陳志明","李德權","鄭律師"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0017","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5015,"summary":"本段文字主要討論都市計畫中「獎勵專案」的適用範圍與法律邏輯。辯方主張都更條例中的綠建築、智慧建築等獎勵並非都更專屬，而是參考《維老條例》而來，且在都市計畫實務中，常採取「先個案、後通案、再立法」的路徑。文中引用多位證人（王錦茂、楊智、少舊配、張立立、劉秀玲、陳志明、李德權）的證詞，強調行政機關在制定細部計畫時具有專業裁量權，可依地區特色制定個案獎勵，而非僅限於都更專案。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0017.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0017.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0017","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0017/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0017/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0017/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}