{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0019.txt","chunk_index":19,"documents_referenced":["113年6月6日偵訊筆錄","113年8月23日逐字稿"],"end_seconds":5905,"keywords":["不當誘導","偵查證詞","公務員","容積獎勵","審理證詞","都委會"],"legal_issues":["偵查階段證詞之可信度與誘導問題","公務員執行職務之合法性","容積獎勵之法令依據","都市計畫委員會之權責範圍"],"legal_issues_raw":["偵查階段證詞之可信度與誘導問題","公務員執行職務之合法性","都市計畫委員會之權責範圍","容積獎勵之法令依據"],"participants":["張莉莉","檢察官","王道","辯方律師","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師","檢察官 (被提及)","王道 (被提及)","張莉莉 (被提及)","邵琇珮 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0019","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5605,"summary":"辯方律師主張檢察官在偵查階段對公務員（如王道、張莉莉等）採取不當誘導、威脅及施壓，導致證人在筆錄中不敢表達真實法律意見或承擔責任，質疑偵查階段證詞之可信度，並強調應以審理階段之證詞（如邵琇珮之證言）為準，主張容積獎勵之決定權在於都委會。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0019.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0019.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0019","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0019/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0019/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0019/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}