{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0020.txt","chunk_index":20,"documents_referenced":["公務文書","計畫書","都委會會議資料","都市計畫法"],"end_seconds":6200,"keywords":["合法性","容積獎勵","法定程序","京華城案","都委會","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["公務員簽署公文之合法性認定","京華城案容積獎勵之法令依據是否合法","都委會審議程序之合法性與透明度","都市計畫法第19條（公開展覽）及第24條（都市計畫變更）之適用性"],"legal_issues_raw":["京華城案容積獎勵之法令依據是否合法","都市計畫法第19條（公開展覽）及第24條（都市計畫變更）之適用性","都委會審議程序之合法性與透明度","公務員簽署公文之合法性認定"],"participants":["以德權","劉秀玲","彭振聲","政律師","林洲民","楊智盛","甲官","胡芳瓊","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["彭振聲","劉秀玲","甲官","政律師","林洲民","胡芳瓊","黃景茂","楊智盛","以德權"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0020","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5900,"summary":"本段逐字稿記錄多位相關人員（包括彭振聲、劉秀玲、林洲民、胡芳瓊、黃景茂、楊智盛、以德權）針對「京華城案」容積獎勵之合法性進行證述。證人一致主張該案之審議程序符合都市計畫法（特別是第19條及第24條）之法定程序，且都委會之審議過程公開透明，認為其行政行為合法，而內容之合理性則屬委員會審酌權限。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0020.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0020.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0020","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0020/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0020/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0020/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}