{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0022.txt","chunk_index":22,"documents_referenced":["9月2日蕭秀配偵訊筆錄","監察院102年調查報告","監察院105年糾正文"],"end_seconds":6790,"keywords":["京華城","偵訊筆錄","監察院","綠建築獎勵","羈押"],"legal_issues":["京華城案之都市計畫獎勵申請合法性","公務員執行職務是否受上級壓力而違法","刑事偵訊中的供述與認罪","羈押理由之認定"],"legal_issues_raw":["刑事偵訊中的供述與認罪","公務員執行職務是否受上級壓力而違法","京華城案之都市計畫獎勵申請合法性","羈押理由之認定"],"participants":["林選禮","柯文哲","法官","蕭秀配"],"participants_raw":["法官","蕭秀配","林選禮","柯文哲"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0022","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":6490,"summary":"本段內容描述蕭秀配在偵訊過程中，面對法官質詢關於京華城案方案指示來源的過程。法官傾向認為該方案非蕭秀配單獨構思，而應有他人指使，並對其施壓要求供出上級或指示者。蕭秀配則堅稱是自己構思且無人壓力。文中亦提及監察院對本案的調查與糾正，以及林選禮在案件中的角色與對柯文哲羈押理由的影響。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0022.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0022.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0022","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0022/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0022/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0022/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}